<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>We Demand Playoffs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com</link>
	<description>Collge football will only get playoffs if the fans demand them</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 17:21:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Conference expansion implications for playoffs</title>
		<link>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/225-conference-expansion-implications-for-playoffs</link>
		<comments>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/225-conference-expansion-implications-for-playoffs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 17:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference expansion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playoff ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super conference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alright so the latest buzz around college football is conference expansion.  Will the Big Ten move to 14 or 16 teams?  Will the PAC Ten follow suit?  You&#8217;ve heard it all before.  But what I want to know is how would any conference alignment changes impact a potential playoff.  
This [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/225-conference-expansion-implications-for-playoffs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best. Bracket. Ever.</title>
		<link>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/221-best-bracket-ever</link>
		<comments>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/221-best-bracket-ever#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlayoffPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playoffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PlayoffPAC has done it again.  This time it is their 2011 BCS playoff bracket that makes a powerful statement in a very simplistic way.  Great job!

Source: PlayoffPAC
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/221-best-bracket-ever/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Down and dirty on BCS money distributions</title>
		<link>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/219-down-and-dirty-on-bcs-money-distributions</link>
		<comments>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/219-down-and-dirty-on-bcs-money-distributions#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boise state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvey Perlman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TCU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/?p=219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are some interesting quotes in this article about last year&#8217;s BCS distributions.  College football really is about the student athlete, not the money, to all the top dogs in the BCS&#8230; and if you believe that, I have some high quality air to sell you for every penny you&#8217;ve got.  
It’s really [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/219-down-and-dirty-on-bcs-money-distributions/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Home stadium bowl game</title>
		<link>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/217-home-stadium-bowl-game</link>
		<comments>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/217-home-stadium-bowl-game#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Playoffs may or may not happen magically overnight, when we least expect it.  In the meantime, we&#8217;re looking at ways to move the ball along through regular channels.
As such, WeDemandPlayoffs.com is pursuing the possibility of starting a bowl game that is played at the home stadium of one of the two participating teams. Here [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/217-home-stadium-bowl-game/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BCS is fair, playoffs are too hard</title>
		<link>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/213-bcs-is-fair-playoffs-are-too-hard</link>
		<comments>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/213-bcs-is-fair-playoffs-are-too-hard#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill hancock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbyists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So says Bill Hancock, executive director of the Bowl Championship Series. You gotta read this article &#8211; Hancock has some incredible quotes that speak volumes to how little the BCS cares what the fans want.  Hancock should simply wear a tshirt around with &#8220;F you, football fans&#8221; on it.  His message would be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/213-bcs-is-fair-playoffs-are-too-hard/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boise State wins Mythical National Championship</title>
		<link>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/211-boise-state-wins-mythical-national-championship</link>
		<comments>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/211-boise-state-wins-mythical-national-championship#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama crimson tide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boise state broncos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mythical national championship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Boise State Broncos are the 2009-2010 college football bowl subdivision national champions.  Congratulations Bronco nation!
We&#8217;ll give #2 to Alabama, who played a decent game last night in the BCS championship game, but just didn&#8217;t prove they could beat Boise State.  To you, Alabama, we say congratulations on a great season.
To Boise State, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/211-boise-state-wins-mythical-national-championship/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calling out winner of Texas and Alabama: Play Boise State at neutral site in 2 weeks!</title>
		<link>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/207-calling-out-winner-of-texas-and-alabama-play-boise-state-at-neutral-site-in-2-weeks</link>
		<comments>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/207-calling-out-winner-of-texas-and-alabama-play-boise-state-at-neutral-site-in-2-weeks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bcs sucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boise state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broncos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bsu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football playoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enough of college football preventing its fans from getting what we want!  Texas, Alabama, whoever wins &#8211; we pre-emptively issue you a challenge: Put a real championship on the line in 2 weeks by facing Boise State in an unsanctioned game.  Are you afraid?  
Fans of college football, we urge you to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/207-calling-out-winner-of-texas-and-alabama-play-boise-state-at-neutral-site-in-2-weeks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PlayoffPAC TV Ad</title>
		<link>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/204-playoffpac-tv-ad</link>
		<comments>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/204-playoffpac-tv-ad#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlayoffPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salt Lake City]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check it out!

This will be airing in SLC, Boise and Dallas soon, according to PlayoffPAC.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/204-playoffpac-tv-ad/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bowl system a racket costing tax-payers millions?</title>
		<link>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/201-bowl-system-a-racket-costing-tax-payers-millions</link>
		<comments>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/201-bowl-system-a-racket-costing-tax-payers-millions#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ball State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bcs sucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIG 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIG XII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bowl system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Schrotenboer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiesta Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holiday Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poinsetta Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Union-Tribune]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/?p=201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Decide for yourself when you look at the facts divulged by Brent Schrotenboer of the San Diego Union-Tribune.
Here&#8217;s the basic formula for bowl games to guarantee themselves money from tax-payer funded public institutions (and some private institutions):

Require minimum ticket purchase by each school
Offer guaranteed pay-out to each school, using guaranteed ticket sales as majority of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/201-bowl-system-a-racket-costing-tax-payers-millions/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glenn Dickey of SF Examiner is anti-playoffs</title>
		<link>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/199-glenn-dickey-of-sf-examiner-is-anti-playoffs</link>
		<comments>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/199-glenn-dickey-of-sf-examiner-is-anti-playoffs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Dickey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playoff foe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Examiner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulations on making our foes list, Glenn Dickey of the San Francisco Examiner! Your pro-bowl system views have earned you a spot of infamy with the college football playoff movement and history will mark you as one of the idiots who tried to impede progress.  That&#8217;s quite a legacy to be proud of.  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wedemandplayoffs.com/199-glenn-dickey-of-sf-examiner-is-anti-playoffs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
